Re: Name limitation question

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> > Isn't the SQL standard 128 chars?
>
> Yes. We tested that a few months ago when we raised the limit from 31
> to 63, and determined that there was a nontrivial additional speed and
> space penalty to raising it to 128. Since nobody could muster a
> real-world use case that actually required 128, we didn't go there.
> But if you feel you need to check off that particular SQL-compliance
> box, see NAMEDATALEN in postgres_ext.h.

Would it make more sense to put this in as a configure option? It
might be rarely changed, but it does seem like the right place for it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200306251101

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE++b0LvJuQZxSWSsgRAiMxAKD3GEYVETU++nq6ye4iR8MEsmUBpgCfRngF
CW1ypGDmDFUsGCEkaTd6+PU=
=bmFP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----