Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Ancient Binary versions ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ancient Binary versions ...
Date: 2007-04-29 19:51:53
Message-ID: 8F500A4CE0C23890D84BDB55@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 20:08:15 +0100 Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> 
wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> Is there a reason why we are keeping them?  Is it not sufficient to keep
>> just  the latest minor version along a branch?  ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7
>> and  earlier?
>
> I think we should keep the source tarballs, but I see no reason to keep the
> binaries.

Oh ya, we have source that goes back to the v1.x days ... :)

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGNPdZ4QvfyHIvDvMRAqCAAJ9yTgjXdv4vdXelR0nvAyKn2pU/nwCgqEli
WqiiwXzB4fseSmBS+9se1Hw=
=hgNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-04-29 20:15:59
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2007-04-29 19:30:36
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group