Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: COPY BINARY is broken...

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: COPY BINARY is broken...
Date: 2000-12-01 22:50:07
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31BF@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > I would rip it out.
> 
> I thought about that too, but was afraid to suggest it ;-)
> 
> How many people are actually using COPY BINARY?

It could be useful if only single scan would be required.
But I have no strong opinion about keeping it.

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alfred PerlsteinDate: 2000-12-01 22:54:26
Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken...
Previous:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-12-01 22:47:48
Subject: RE: COPY BINARY is broken...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group