Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: xlog_bufmgr

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: xlog_bufmgr
Date: 2000-11-30 01:35:23
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31B6@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Would it be OK now to eliminate the separate xlog_bufmgr.c and
> xlog_localbuf.c files, folding that code back into bufmgr.c and
> localbuf.c?  It's a real pain to have to make parallel updates
> in two copies of that code...

Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon.

Vadim

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-11-30 01:39:35
Subject: Logging for sequences
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-30 00:42:53
Subject: Re: [SQL] Rules with Conditions: Bug, or Misunderstanding

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group