Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?
Date: 2000-09-26 23:05:49
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D17@SECTORBASE1 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked 
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> 
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...

Ops. Ok...

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-09-27 00:06:37
Subject: Re: use of / in ~ vs. ~*
Previous:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-09-26 22:06:48
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group