RE: Big 7.1 open items

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-27 19:37:34
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C3C@SECTORBASE1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Then the system tables from different databases would collide.
> >
> > Actually, if we're going to use unique-ids for file names
> > then we have to know how to get system file names anyway.
> > Hm, OID+VERSION would make our life easier... Hiroshi?
>
> I assume we were going to have a pg_class.relversion to do that, but
^^^^^^^^
PG_CLASS_OID.VERSION_ID...

Just a clarification -:)

> that is per-database because pg_class is per-database.

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-27 19:40:27 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-27 19:34:42 Re: Big 7.1 open items