Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Date: 2008-04-02 20:53:01
Message-ID: 8C18830A0F3A6429ECDB60A8@ganymede.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:10:59 +0200 Magnus Hagander 
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:


> Could it be that a commit was done while the tag operation was running?
> Given that neither is an atomic operation in cvs, and it used to be
> that large repo operations could take quite a long time?

I doubt it, back in 7.1 days, we had something like 4 committers, I think, and 
all core members ... very little chance of overlap ... the weird thing is Peter 
is reporting its *all* on the 7.1 branch ... none of hte others affected ...

- -- 
Marc G. Fournier        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFH8/It4QvfyHIvDvMRAqnKAJ4h/+4elPLe3XEfW9lRU6IfAAiSWgCcCRCd
pWs76n1JzLgiOExj6kGytBA=
=XVkS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-02 20:53:09
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-02 20:48:19
Subject: Re: bug in float8in()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group