Sorry for top-posting -- challenged reader.
Perhaps a future addition as \L ?
This command doesn't seem to be used and could be documented as being subject to permissions and slower.
I actually would find this useful, but there are other ways of getting it. But having the option would be nice sometimes IMHO.
[I've been testing 8.3beta1 with no issues and have just installed the beta2 release, hence I've been lurking on this list. No errors other than self-inflicted ones.]
GlobeXplorer LLC, a DigitalGlobe company
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
(My corporate masters made me say this.)
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Wed 10/31/2007 5:44 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: andy; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql show dbsize?
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Brendan Jurd||Date: 2007-11-01 01:32:08|
|Subject: Re: A small rant about coding style for backend functions|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-10-31 23:44:16|
|Subject: Re: psql show dbsize? |