Am 26.09.2007 um 13:16 schrieb Dave Cramer:
> Yes, according to the change log it was fixed in 302.
> Why are you using 8.0 anyway ? It's verging on end of life ?
Well, it is deployed on running systems at customers (running 8.2.4
on the backend side).
Unfortunately the customer reported errors and the situation very
much looks like
that old pre 302 situation. That is why I ask if 312 should have the
fix (and thus already
be implemented at the customer) or not.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Ludovico Bianchini||Date: 2007-09-27 10:20:10|
|Subject: ResultSet with more than 5 rows causes error |
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2007-09-26 14:27:02|
|Subject: Re: Idle in Transaction ..|