Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Idle in Transaction ..

From: "Heiko W(dot)Rupp" <heiko(dot)rupp(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idle in Transaction ..
Date: 2007-09-26 17:29:00
Message-ID: 8A9AB604-D69C-45E2-8BD6-A2EB4A7A7AAC@redhat.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Am 26.09.2007 um 13:16 schrieb Dave Cramer:

> Yes, according to the change log it was fixed in 302.
>
> Why are you using 8.0 anyway ? It's verging on end of life ?
>
Well, it is deployed on running systems at customers (running 8.2.4  
on the backend side).

Unfortunately the customer reported errors and the situation very  
much looks like
that old pre 302 situation. That is why I ask if 312 should have the  
fix (and thus already
be implemented at the customer) or not.

  Thanks
     Heiko

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Ludovico BianchiniDate: 2007-09-27 10:20:10
Subject: ResultSet with more than 5 rows causes error
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-09-26 14:27:02
Subject: Re: Idle in Transaction ..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group