| From: | Kovács Péter <peter(dot)kovacs(at)sysdata(dot)siemens(dot)hu> |
|---|---|
| To: | noselasd(at)frisurf(dot)no, daniel(dot)fisher(at)vt(dot)edu, Daniel Fisher <dfisher(at)vt(dot)edu>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: Large Objects |
| Date: | 2001-07-30 07:12:04 |
| Message-ID: | 8A2DDD7ED7876A4698F6FF204F62CBFCD2FE60@budg112a.sysdata.siemens.hu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
This would be the standard way of inserting Large Objects. But last time I
looked at it, it did not work with the jdbc implementation provided with
pgsql.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nils O. Selåsdal [mailto:noselasd(at)frisurf(dot)no]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:44 PM
To: daniel(dot)fisher(at)vt(dot)edu; Daniel Fisher; pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Large Objects
if you want to insert Large Objects, you need to use one of the setXXXStream
of the statement, not setBytes.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-07-30 07:19:20 | Re: Re: "Oracle's ROWNUM" |
| Previous Message | will trillich | 2001-07-30 06:05:36 | RULE vs TRIGGER |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-30 14:51:24 | Re: [PATCHES] Merging JDBC1 and JDBC2 similarities |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-07-29 20:37:54 | RE: Large Objects |