Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Improve Query

From: Zach Calvert <zachcalvert(at)hemerasoftware(dot)com>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dan Scott <balancedtree(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve Query
Date: 2009-05-27 16:37:06
Message-ID: 89af81ab0905270937q3618ea9fj43d5809625c59d23@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Still getting a seq scan after doing vacuum analyze.  Any other ideas?

2009/5/27 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> you have to vacuum analyze after you've created index, afaik.
> No, count(*) is still counting rows.
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-05-27 17:10:20
Subject: Re: Improve Query
Previous:From: Grzegorz JaśkiewiczDate: 2009-05-27 16:32:50
Subject: Re: Improve Query

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group