Re: Reason for PG being seemingly I/O bound?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Harshad <harshad(dot)rj(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reason for PG being seemingly I/O bound?
Date: 2009-09-13 19:15:27
Message-ID: 8970.1252869327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Harshad <harshad(dot)rj(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am trying to figure out why a very simple query turns out to be I/O
> bound.

It's hard to see how that case could be I/O bound, unless your machine
is seriously starved for memory. Did you watch "vmstat 1" or something
similar to confirm that a lot of I/O is really happening?

> I have put this query in simple.sql, and running it in a tight loop in the shell thusly:

> while [ true ] ; do psql -d twinkle -U postgres -f simple.sql; done > /dev/null

FWIW, the overhead of the above is just enormous --- starting up a new
database connection takes way more time than issuing one simple query.
However I still don't see how it would be I/O bound; the kernel
certainly ought to have everything needed in disk cache after a couple
of cycles. On my machine a similar test immediately pins the CPU
with about half user, half system time.

What platform are you using, exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Davis 2009-09-14 01:42:47 Re: using SQL for multi-machine job management?
Previous Message manaus 2009-09-13 17:38:19 qualified names