| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav |
| Date: | 2012-08-15 04:15:22 |
| Message-ID: | 8935.1345004122@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 14 August 2012 21:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't have
>> a microsecond specification.
> I think that if we eventually decide to change the name of
> commit_delay for 9.3 (you previously suggested that that might be
> revisited), it will be reasonable to have the new GUC in units of
> milliseconds.
Well, the reason why it's like that at all is the thought that values
of less than 1 millisecond might be useful. Are we prepared to suppose
that that is not and never will be true?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-08-15 10:51:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-15 04:08:58 | pgsql: Resurrect the "last ditch" code path in join_search_one_level(). |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-08-15 04:15:58 | Re: betatesting: ERROR: failed to build any 2-way joins on 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-15 04:11:47 | Re: betatesting: ERROR: failed to build any 2-way joins on 9.2 |