"Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:19:47PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> Well, it is already included. The current proposal is simply to
>> improve the existing type. I guess you are arguing a different
>> proposal altogether - to remove the existing type.
> The existing type is depricated and has been since at least 8.1; so yes,
> it's slated for removal.
Well, my perception of that has always been "it needs to be upgraded or
removed". So if D'Arcy wants to work on the improvement angle, I have
no problem with him doing so. The thing we need to negotiate is "how
much improvement is needed to keep it in core".
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-09-29 03:36:18|
|Subject: Re: JAVA Support |
|Previous:||From: Florian G. Pflug||Date: 2006-09-29 02:21:20|
|Subject: Re: Patch: Tie stats options to autovacuum in postgresql.conf|