Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] GEQO Triggers Server Crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <jurka(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GEQO Triggers Server Crash
Date: 2002-12-11 04:37:18
Message-ID: 8900.1039581438@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can we free only the plans we want to free in geqo?  I don't mind having
> a different free method in geqo vs. the rest of the optimizer.

GEQO calls "the rest of the optimizer", and the space that we're
worried about is almost all allocated in "the rest of the optimizer".
How are you going to implement two different free methods?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-11 04:54:33
Subject: Re: Problems with ALTER DOMAIN patch
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-11 04:35:35
Subject: Re: Reusing Dead Tuples:

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-11 05:46:30
Subject: Re: Bug #844: initdb fails on an ext2/3 fs mounted on /var/lib/pgsql/data
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-12-11 03:52:28
Subject: Re: ecpg Oracle compatibility issue

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group