Re: [HACKERS] GEQO Triggers Server Crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <jurka(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GEQO Triggers Server Crash
Date: 2002-12-11 04:37:18
Message-ID: 8900.1039581438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can we free only the plans we want to free in geqo? I don't mind having
> a different free method in geqo vs. the rest of the optimizer.

GEQO calls "the rest of the optimizer", and the space that we're
worried about is almost all allocated in "the rest of the optimizer".
How are you going to implement two different free methods?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-11 05:46:30 Re: Bug #844: initdb fails on an ext2/3 fs mounted on /var/lib/pgsql/data
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-11 03:52:28 Re: ecpg Oracle compatibility issue

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-11 04:54:33 Re: Problems with ALTER DOMAIN patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-11 04:35:35 Re: Reusing Dead Tuples: