Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 21:09:58
Message-ID: 88666B29-6BCC-4615-B92A-4FE6A3E6C9AD@pgexperts.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:

>> That solves the problem with recursion or with $a and $b or both?
> 
> Yes ATM because we only kick in the extra security if you are on
> threads... Its a bit of a kludge in Safe.  I know Tim wants to rectify
> that...

By adding the extra security when *not* under threads as well?

I find this all very confusing, frankly.

Best,

David


In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tim BunceDate: 2010-02-25 22:16:06
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous:From: Alex HunsakerDate: 2010-02-25 21:08:04
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group