Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces
Date: 2004-03-03 05:36:38
Message-ID: 8850.1078292198@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>> symlinks.

> Agreed, but are we going to support non-tablespace installs?  I wasn't
> sure that was an option.

A setup containing only the default tablespace cannot use any symlinks.
That doesn't seem hard though.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2004-03-03 08:14:31
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-03 05:33:51
Subject: Re: Out of space situation and WAL log pre-allocation (was Tablespaces)

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-03-03 10:00:07
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-03-03 05:25:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group