Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: MVCC doc improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements
Date: 2002-12-17 16:53:36
Message-ID: 8820.1040144016@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, but what I disagree with is the recommendation that "concurrent
> applications" should use B-trees -- a concurrent application that wishes
> to index non-scalar data won't have a lot of success using B-trees,

True, there are cases where you have no choice.  That does not mean that
we should fail to make this recommendation for cases where you have a
choice.

I'm not objecting to improving the text.  I am objecting to deleting it
outright...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-12-17 17:19:34
Subject: Re: documentation improvements
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-12-17 16:43:21
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group