Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> 2012/7/3 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Um... what should happen if there was a SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
>> to the portal's userId?  This test will think nothing happened.

> In my test, all the jobs by SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION was cleaned-up...
> It makes nothing happen from viewpoint of users.

My point is that it seems like a bug that the secContext gets restored
in one case and not the other, depending on which user ID was specified
in SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started at 2012-07-03 15:42:17 from Kohei KaiGai

Responses

• Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started at 2012-07-03 16:46:13 from Kohei KaiGai

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2012-07-03 16:09:59
	Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-07-03 16:02:21
	Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch