From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Enum proposal / design |
Date: | 2006-08-23 09:13:27 |
Message-ID: | 87zmdvolvs.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> I think it would be good to have something, so that people are
> occasionally reminded about these things. That's a good way to help
> shake ideas out.
I think the only reason there aren't more outrageous dreamworld ideas in the
TODO is that people came along and did a lot of them. 3-phase-commit,
nested-transactions, PITR, etc. were all at some point pretty pie in the sky.
At some level there's not much point in keeping a TODO of ideas we know how to
do, most of those ideas just get done.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak | 2006-08-23 09:17:19 | Leaving... (was: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view) |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-23 08:49:05 | Re: pg_upgrade: What is changed? |