From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "NikhilS" <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Docs" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Date: | 2007-11-29 17:08:29 |
Message-ID: | 87zlwxj7xu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> A trigger will probably beat a rule for inserts/updates involving a small
>> number of rows.
>
> Which is exactly what partitioning is doing.
Say what?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-29 17:12:55 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-29 16:49:11 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-29 17:12:55 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-29 16:49:11 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |