Re: best way to fetch next/prev record based on index

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> The only reason the code in parse_expr.c appears new is that the
> functionality used to be in gram.y.

Ah, that was what I was missing. Though it's odd since it seems there was code
in parse_expr.c to handle the "=" case specially.

> I'd like to see this fixed to comply with the spec, but given the lack
> of complaints about the existing behavior over so many years, ripping
> it out meanwhile doesn't seem appropriate.

I tried my hand at this last night and think I did an ok first pass. But I'm
missing one piece of the puzzle to get it to compile.

What do I need to know to be able to construct a List* suitable for passing as
the second arg to make_op() knowing only that I want to create a List* to
represent "=" or "<" or so on?

I also had another question I didn't ask in the other email. In the midst of a
forboth() loop, how would I tell if I'm at the last element of the lists?
Would lnext(l)==NULL do it?

--
greg