Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Commit fest?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest?
Date: 2008-03-17 16:31:32
Message-ID: 87y78hb9cr.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on 
>> search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there 
>> perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If 
>> that's all we need, we could easily have an url like 
>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?msgid=19873987123(at)foo(dot)com redirect 
>> to the proper page on archives?
>
> Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link
> to that easily.

I would very much like such a URL as well. At a guess it would require hacking
the tsearch parser we use for the search engine on the web site?

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-17 16:48:16
Subject: Re: Better error message for select_common_type()
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-17 16:23:06
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CIC and deadlocks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group