bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com (Brian Hurt) writes:
> Thought I'd point this blog post out to the list:
> http://www.miketec.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/7-Oracle-and-Postgres-Redux.html

There's actually something unfair about the comparison, in an "unfair
to Oracle" way, namely that he's using  version 8i, which dates
back to the PostgreSQL 6.5 days ;-).

And vis-a-vis the comments about it possibly being not-permissible to
release numbers, it's quite possible that 8i is old enough that when
the guy bought his licenses, there wasn't such a clause in the
purchase contract.  

And that's purest speculation, so it could indeed be not-permissible,
and the guy may look forward to having lawyers-with-samurai-swords
knock on his door ;-).
-- 
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxfinances.info" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxfinances.info/info/internet.html
The software isn't finished until the last user is dead.

In response to

• Postgres vr.s Oracle at 2008-12-10 19:08:28 from Brian Hurt

Responses

• Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle at 2008-12-11 07:42:56 from Greg Smith

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:	From: Rodrigo E. De León Plicet	Date: 2008-12-10 21:31:27
	Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous:	From: Brian Hurt	Date: 2008-12-10 20:41:20
	Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle