Re: C vs. C++ contributions

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C vs. C++ contributions
Date: 2002-08-27 22:52:57
Message-ID: 87wuqbzzg5.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com> writes:
> PostgreSQL parse/bind/execute Layer:
> ------------------------------------
> This would be mimicked since PostgreSQL doesn't support it
> natively.

What's stopping you from implementing native support for this? There
will hopefully be an FE/BE protocol change during the 7.4 development
cycle, which should give you the opportunity to make any
protocol-level changes required to implement this properly.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-08-27 23:00:25 Re: fix for palloc() of user-supplied length
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-08-27 22:39:48 Re: Proposed GUC Variable