Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.
For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you
want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version
of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)?
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"?
> That, I like.
Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch
later tonight, now is comute time.
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-11-29 17:24:54|
|Subject: Re: profiling connection overhead|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-11-29 17:18:52|
|Subject: Re: PROPOSAL of xmlvalidate|