Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Date: 2008-01-07 16:43:50
Message-ID: 87tzlp60xl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> On the other hand we can't just ignore all vacuums because someone could issue
> a manual vacuum inside a transaction (I think?). 

Doh, ignore this. sigh.


-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-01-07 16:55:09
Subject: Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid
Previous:From: Holger HoffstaetteDate: 2008-01-07 16:33:53
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-01-07 16:50:32
Subject: Re: basic questions: Postgres with yum on CentOS 5.1
Previous:From: Thomas PundtDate: 2008-01-07 16:27:06
Subject: Re: File system level backup from 32bit to 64bit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group