| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4 |
| Date: | 2008-01-07 16:43:50 |
| Message-ID: | 87tzlp60xl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On the other hand we can't just ignore all vacuums because someone could issue
> a manual vacuum inside a transaction (I think?).
Doh, ignore this. sigh.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-01-07 16:50:32 | Re: basic questions: Postgres with yum on CentOS 5.1 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Pundt | 2008-01-07 16:27:06 | Re: File system level backup from 32bit to 64bit |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-07 16:55:09 | Re: Bug: Unreferenced temp tables disables vacuum to update xid |
| Previous Message | Holger Hoffstaette | 2008-01-07 16:33:53 | Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory |