Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
Date: 2006-09-17 14:45:15
Message-ID: 87sliqv9fo.fsf@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

>> 1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has
>> been authorized by someone else?
>
> In my mind it is someone who without threw a process of email confirmation.
> Just to help stave off the amount of trolling that may happen.

I guess it depends on whether you feel the larger of the project's problems is
too many people trying to help who must be stopped before they do something
that may need to be corrected or too few people getting past the natural
barriers to being able to contribute.

The former would be a great problem to have but I don't see any evidence of
it.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-09-17 14:47:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-09-17 14:42:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-09-17 14:47:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-09-17 14:42:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group