Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO: GNU TLS

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc,Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>,Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2007-01-03 14:12:21
Message-ID: 87slesw662.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Stephen Frost:

> Ah, this does sound rather ugly and not something we'd want.  The
> particular library doesn't make a whole heck of alot of difference to me
> provided it has the general functionality necessary and a compatible
> license (where 'compatible' in this case really means 'Debian feels it
> is compatible with the GPL').

And several (L)GPL-incompatible licensses.  It wouldn't surprise me if
there were a few applications released under licenses which are not
GPL-compatible which also link to libpq.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-01-03 15:16:41
Subject: Re: Added the word TODO in comments
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-01-03 14:12:10
Subject: pg_ctl options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group