| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |
| Date: | 2007-02-28 00:49:37 |
| Message-ID: | 87slcrp0m6.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> On 2/27/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I see no reason to implement it if there is no performance gain.
> However, I strongly concur that we need at least some evidence. It could
> easily be that a misstep in the code, causes a loop over the wrong set
> and all the performance we thought we would get is invalid, not because
> of theory or what should happen, but because of actual implementation.
It rather sounds like you're asking for a proof that Simon can write bug-free
code before you allow him to write any code.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-28 00:55:44 | Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-28 00:22:14 | Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) |