Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2007-05-13 13:39:45
Message-ID: 87sla07sgu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:

> I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving away from a
> backslash command (which I'm guessing would be painful).
>
> Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn
> [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get.

I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations.

I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm
not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-05-13 15:23:01 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2007-05-13 13:20:40 pg_standby question

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-05-13 15:37:01 Re: Performance monitoring
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-13 11:45:17 Re: ECPG patch to use prepare for improved performance