From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Date: | 2007-05-13 13:39:45 |
Message-ID: | 87sla07sgu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving away from a
> backslash command (which I'm guessing would be painful).
>
> Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn
> [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get.
I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations.
I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm
not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-05-13 15:23:01 | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-05-13 13:20:40 | pg_standby question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-05-13 15:37:01 | Re: Performance monitoring |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-13 11:45:17 | Re: ECPG patch to use prepare for improved performance |