| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Shelby Cain" <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Terry Yapt" <yapt(at)technovell(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32) |
| Date: | 2007-08-24 16:17:21 |
| Message-ID: | 87sl68zz3i.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> There are a few old bits of code that still use MAKE_PTR/MAKE_OFFSET,
> but I think it's mostly just that no one's bothered to rewrite the code
> for SHM_QUEUE linked lists. The vast majority of our shmem structures
> use regular pointers, and have for years.
Ah, I happened to be recently in that code so I was mislead.
So even in EXEC_BACKEND we require that we can attach to the shared memory at
a specified location. hm.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-24 16:46:46 | Re: Out of Memory - 8.2.4 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-24 16:04:56 | Re: FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32) |