Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date: 2008-12-15 21:51:29
Message-ID: 87skopnm3i.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:

> Jonah,
>
>> Where you should be looking is at the price/performance benchmarks,
>> because that's where Postgres plays.  Last time I checked Postgres on
>> a TPC-C, albeit being 100% free, was anywhere from $4.00 to $6.00 per
>> transaction depending on the hardware.  Compare that to Oracle's $0.68
>> or SQL Server's $0.84. 
>
> You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC.  They're not the same benchmark.

Eh? DBT2 is a (partial) implementation of TPC-C. The nature of benchmarks is
that small infelicities could invalidate the whole result though and there are
definitely infelicities in DBT2's implementation of TPC-C.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2008-12-15 21:56:08
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-12-15 21:12:07
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Conference East: Survey Closed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group