On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:43:49 -0700,
"Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, I was able to get PostgreSQL Update-able views to work nearly as
> well as the update-able queries did in Access.
Would you mind sharing a sample schema?
> As a side note, you'll notice that MS-Access will not allow
> update-able queries based on ODBC linked table like it does on its
> native tables for this reason.
That's right, I did find that out once but didn't know whether it was
due to ODBC limitations or something else.
> Natural Primary key/Foreign key CASCADE UPDATEs don't work well with
> update-able views. Choose one or the other.
Not sure what you mean; can you please tell more about what doesn't work
well with updateable views what the choice is?
Thanks for the feedback,
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Abdul Rahman||Date: 2008-09-29 05:03:43|
|Subject: Replication using slony-I|
|Previous:||From: Matthew Pulis||Date: 2008-09-29 04:43:52|
|Subject: PostgreSQL Cache|