Re: Extensions User Design

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Date: 2009-06-24 07:59:28
Message-ID: 87r5xauknz.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Dimitri
> Fontaine<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>  - a core team approved list of extensions (replacing contribs,
>
> are you aware of the enormous job that will imply for core team?

I'm not saying I want core to take care of all pgfoundry projects that
will make them available as extensions, but to have contrib/ made
extensions and have core if possible continue doing what they have been
doing... forever?

> maybe a community approved list of extensions or maybe we can have
> some kind of jury (just like patch reviewers) that could test and mark
> as tested... i remember a conversation about this very point

Having other sources of extensions apart from contrib seems to me a very
good idea.

--
Dimitri Fontaine
PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2009-06-24 09:38:26 Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-06-24 05:29:45 Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen