From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extensions User Design |
Date: | 2009-06-24 07:59:28 |
Message-ID: | 87r5xauknz.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Dimitri
> Fontaine<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> - a core team approved list of extensions (replacing contribs,
>
> are you aware of the enormous job that will imply for core team?
I'm not saying I want core to take care of all pgfoundry projects that
will make them available as extensions, but to have contrib/ made
extensions and have core if possible continue doing what they have been
doing... forever?
> maybe a community approved list of extensions or maybe we can have
> some kind of jury (just like patch reviewers) that could test and mark
> as tested... i remember a conversation about this very point
Having other sources of extensions apart from contrib seems to me a very
good idea.
--
Dimitri Fontaine
PostgreSQL DBA, Architecte
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-06-24 09:38:26 | Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1 |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2009-06-24 05:29:45 | Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen |