Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The only problem i have found until now is that
> update v_foo set col1 = DEFAULT; execute nextval twice per every record.
> so there will be a gasp between numbers, but AFAIK nextval has no guarantee
> of returning sequential numbers.
While there's no guarantee that strong there's still an expected behaviour.
sequences generate sequential numbers and only skip in specific cases.
I think this would still surprise and bother most users.
--
greg