Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Multiple logical databases

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multiple logical databases
Date: 2006-02-03 15:29:27
Message-ID: 87psm4zciw.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:

> It is similar to a proxy, yes, but that is just part of it. The setup and
> running of these systems should all be managed.

All that requires is some scripts that wrap pg_ctl and bring the right
instances up and down, perhaps with a web interface on top of them.  I
don't see any need to put that functionality in the proxy.

-Doug

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris CampbellDate: 2006-02-03 15:55:03
Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-03 15:29:22
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: St├ęphane SCHILDKNECHTDate: 2006-02-03 15:36:23
Subject: Number format problem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-02-03 15:29:22
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group