Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2
Date: 2006-12-19 15:22:13
Message-ID: 87psafkj16.fsf@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:

> I'm not a big fan of ordering columns to optimise record layout, except in the
> most extreme cases (massive DW type apps). I think visible column order should
> be logical, not governed by physical considerations.

Well as long as we're talking "should"s the database should take care of this
for you anyways.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SDDate: 2006-12-19 15:25:18
Subject: Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-19 15:19:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-12-19 15:48:41
Subject: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-19 15:19:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enums patch v2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group