Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
Date: 2007-03-01 10:04:20
Message-ID: 87ps7ts2jf.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:

> Maybe a suitable replacement for full-page would be to sync the first WAL
> record for a page change before writing the buffer

We *always* sync WAL records for page changes before writing the buffer for
the page.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-01 10:26:23 Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ?
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-03-01 09:45:42 Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option