"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> - the int8inc(), int2_sum() and int4_sum() used pointers directly from the
> for performance, that code path is now commented out, the other code path
> is correct for the AggState and !AggState runs and correct every time and now
> because of the passbyval nature of int8, the !AggState version is not slower
> than using the pointer directly.
Does this mean count() and sum() are slower on a 32-bit machine?
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Zoltan Boszormenyi||Date: 2008-03-24 23:15:05|
|Subject: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value,
was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2008-03-24 22:38:16|
|Subject: Re: script binaries renaming|