]] Robert Haas 

| I've sometimes wondered why keepalives aren't the default for all TCP
| connections.  They seem like they're usually a Good Thing (TM), but I
| wonder if we can think of any situations where someone might not want
| them?

As somebody mentioned somewhere else (I think): If you pay per byte
transmitted, be it 3G/GPRS.  Or if you're on a very, very high-latency
link or have no bandwidth.  Like, a rocket to Mars or maybe the moon.
While I think they are valid use-cases, requiring people to change the
defaults if that kind of thing sounds like a sensible solution to me.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen 
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

In response to

• Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq at 2010-02-11 16:16:36 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Sabino Mullane	Date: 2010-02-11 17:08:30
	Subject: Re: Confusion over Python drivers
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2010-02-11 17:07:46
	Subject: Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules