"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Well, it's the end of March, and I'm already starting to feel like we've
> been commit-festing forever :-(. At this point I see only one remaining
> patch that seems likely to go in without any further discussion --- that's
> Pavel's plpgsql EXECUTE USING thing.
A huge *thank you* for all your efforts. I know it's not the fun part of
> However, we've got boatloads of stuff that needs discussion and
> consensus-achievement. Please take a look at the queue
Alvaro tried to dump this list into:
> and comment where you can. Remember that substantive comments or
> reviews should go to the mailing lists --- you can add annotations to
> that page if you want, but they'll be ephemeral.
And the patch authors are unlikely to see them unless they're also doing
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-03-31 08:48:46|
|Subject: Re: Submission of Feature Request : RFC- for Implementing
Transparent Data Encryption in P|
|Previous:||From: NikhilS||Date: 2008-03-31 08:36:16|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [email@example.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited]|