Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 17:59:34
Message-ID: 87mydangc9.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:

>>> 3. Date handling
>>> Sometimes I've got data with invalid dates and it would be great if it
>>> could replace all the bad ones with, say "0000-00-00".
>>>     
>
> Oh dear $DEITY, no. 

I think it would be best if we limited ourselves right now to discussing the
problems themselves and not debating the pros and cons of possible solutions.

I want to encourage people to post their peeves even if they know perfectly
well the reasons why things are the way they are.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Jeff FrostDate: 2009-01-29 18:12:35
Subject: Re: Full backup - pg_dumpall sufficient?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-29 17:53:20
Subject: Re: ssl to more than one server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group