"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I didn't do anything about it at the time, but now I am tempted to
> modify LookupOpclassInfo() so that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS disables
> its internal cache. Any objections?
That sounds not equivalent to receiving a relcache flush at any particular
point in time where a relcache flush could be received. Wouldn't it make more
sense (and test more code) to go ahead and cache all the same data but flush
it whenever a relcache flush could possibly be received?
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jonah H. Harris||Date: 2007-11-29 01:05:02|
|Subject: Re: quotas once again|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2007-11-28 23:21:56|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors|