Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "List pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O
Date: 2008-06-27 14:25:47
Message-ID: 87lk0rq7is.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

> If only VACUUM is going to set "flexible" to off, maybe it's better to
> leave the APIs as they are and have a global that's set by VACUUM only
> (and reset in a PG_CATCH block).

Ugh. Perhaps it would be simpler to have a wrapper function HTSV() macro which
passes flexible=true to HTSV_internal(). Then vacuum can call HTSV_internal().

I'm not sure what the performance tradeoff is between having an extra argument
to HTSV and having HTSV check a global which messes with optimizations.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-06-27 14:36:02 Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2008-06-27 13:49:53 ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-06-27 14:36:02 Re: [HACKERS] Hint Bits and Write I/O
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-27 12:32:30 Re: Removal of the patches email list