Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-16 22:37:31
Message-ID: 87k74wl784.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> In normal operation the only thing that should be signalling a
> backend is the postmaster.

Oh? What about LISTEN/NOTIFY?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-12-16 22:42:38 Re: [GENERAL][ADMIN]data fragmentation
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-12-16 22:03:14 Re: [GENERAL][HACKERS]data fragmentation

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Tibbett 2003-12-16 22:39:26 Thread-safe signals
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-12-16 21:43:02 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch