Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date: 2008-12-16 20:14:26
Message-ID: 87k59zop25.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit. I
>>> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained
>>> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate. And
>>> then start running it.
>>
>> Agreed. For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit.
>
> I don't recall turning away patches to make the dbt kits less TPC spec
> compliant...

Uhm, why would we send them to you? Are you the maintainer for DBT2 now? I
looked recently and couldn't find any upstream source that had been touched
any time within the last few years. Where do i find it?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Selena Deckelmann 2008-12-16 20:29:50 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous Message Mark Wong 2008-12-16 19:56:07 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle