Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-05 09:58:39
Message-ID: 87iqvkwt2o.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:

> do I need to worry about memory leaks in citext_eq, citext_ne, citext_gt,
> etc.,

yes

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: H.HaradaDate: 2008-07-05 10:04:29
Subject: introduction of WIP window function patch
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-07-05 09:58:04
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group