| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Date: | 2007-05-13 22:35:13 |
| Message-ID: | 87hcqg73oe.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:39:45PM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
>>
>> I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm
>> not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here.
>
> \c& sounds fine (as do \c1...\c9). \g& would probably be helpful as well
> (send query buffer to server in nowait mode).
Er, I just realized I typed the wrong thing there. It can't be \c& since I do
assign a meaning to that "make a new connection to the same place as this
one".
I meant \&
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-13 22:44:02 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-05-13 22:22:12 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-13 22:44:02 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-05-13 22:22:12 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |