Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gabrielle Roth" <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
Date: 2008-12-21 01:33:02
Message-ID: 87hc4yuxbl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> To recap, dbt2 is a fair-use derivative of the TPC-C benchmark. We
> are using a 1000 warehouse database, which amounts to about 100GB of
> raw text data.

Really? Do you get conforming results with 1,000 warehouses? What's the 95th
percentile response time?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Nawothnig 2008-12-21 08:17:46 PostgreSQL vs Oracle
Previous Message Mark Wong 2008-12-21 00:54:39 dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5